Featured
Table of Contents
Most of its issues can be ironed out one method or another. Now, companies need to begin to think about how agents can allow brand-new methods of doing work.
Business can also build the internal abilities to develop and test representatives including generative, analytical, and deterministic AI. Successful agentic AI will need all of the tools in the AI toolbox. Randy's newest survey of information and AI leaders in large organizations the 2026 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Study, performed by his instructional company, Data & AI Management Exchange discovered some great news for information and AI management.
Nearly all concurred that AI has caused a greater focus on data. Possibly most excellent is the more than 20% increase (to 70%) over in 2015's study results (and those of previous years) in the percentage of participants who think that the chief data officer (with or without analytics and AI consisted of) is an effective and recognized role in their organizations.
Simply put, assistance for information, AI, and the management function to manage it are all at record highs in big enterprises. The just tough structural issue in this picture is who need to be managing AI and to whom they need to report in the company. Not surprisingly, a growing percentage of business have named chief AI officers (or a comparable title); this year, it depends on 39%.
Only 30% report to a primary information officer (where we believe the function must report); other companies have AI reporting to service management (27%), technology management (34%), or transformation management (9%). We believe it's likely that the varied reporting relationships are adding to the extensive problem of AI (particularly generative AI) not delivering adequate value.
Development is being made in value awareness from AI, however it's most likely inadequate to justify the high expectations of the innovation and the high evaluations for its suppliers. Maybe if the AI bubble does deflate a bit, there will be less interest from several different leaders of business in owning the technology.
Davenport and Randy Bean predict which AI and data science trends will reshape company in 2026. This column series looks at the biggest information and analytics obstacles facing contemporary business and dives deep into successful use cases that can help other companies accelerate their AI progress. Thomas H. Davenport (@tdav) is the President's Distinguished Teacher of Info Technology and Management and professors director of the Metropoulos Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Babson College, and a fellow of the MIT Effort on the Digital Economy.
Randy Bean (@randybeannvp) has been a consultant to Fortune 1000 organizations on information and AI management for over 4 years. He is the author of Fail Fast, Find Out Faster: Lessons in Data-Driven Leadership in an Age of Interruption, Big Data, and AI (Wiley, 2021).
What does AI do for business? Digital change with AI can yield a variety of benefits for services, from expense savings to service delivery.
Other benefits organizations reported attaining include: Enhancing insights and decision-making (53%) Minimizing expenses (40%) Enhancing client/customer relationships (38%) Improving products/services and cultivating development (20%) Increasing profits (20%) Income growth mainly stays an aspiration, with 74% of organizations hoping to grow income through their AI initiatives in the future compared to just 20% that are currently doing so.
Ultimately, however, success with AI isn't practically enhancing effectiveness and even growing revenue. It's about achieving strategic differentiation and a lasting competitive edge in the market. How is AI transforming organization functions? One-third (34%) of surveyed companies are beginning to use AI to deeply transformcreating brand-new product or services or reinventing core processes or service designs.
The remaining third (37%) are utilizing AI at a more surface level, with little or no change to existing procedures. While each are catching efficiency and efficiency gains, only the first group are genuinely reimagining their organizations rather than optimizing what already exists. Furthermore, various types of AI technologies yield different expectations for impact.
The business we spoke with are already deploying autonomous AI agents across diverse functions: A financial services company is constructing agentic workflows to automatically catch meeting actions from video conferences, draft communications to advise individuals of their dedications, and track follow-through. An air carrier is utilizing AI agents to help consumers finish the most common deals, such as rebooking a flight or rerouting bags, maximizing time for human representatives to address more complex matters.
In the general public sector, AI agents are being utilized to cover workforce shortages, partnering with human employees to finish key procedures. Physical AI: Physical AI applications span a wide variety of industrial and commercial settings. Common use cases for physical AI consist of: collective robotics (cobots) on assembly lines Examination drones with automated response capabilities Robotic picking arms Self-governing forklifts Adoption is especially advanced in manufacturing, logistics, and defense, where robotics, self-governing vehicles, and drones are currently improving operations.
Enterprises where senior leadership actively forms AI governance accomplish substantially higher business worth than those delegating the work to technical groups alone. True governance makes oversight everyone's function, embedding it into efficiency rubrics so that as AI deals with more jobs, human beings handle active oversight. Self-governing systems also increase needs for information and cybersecurity governance.
In terms of policy, effective governance integrates with existing risk and oversight structures, not parallel "shadow" functions. It focuses on recognizing high-risk applications, imposing accountable design practices, and ensuring independent recognition where suitable. Leading companies proactively keep an eye on developing legal requirements and develop systems that can demonstrate safety, fairness, and compliance.
As AI abilities extend beyond software into devices, machinery, and edge locations, organizations need to assess if their technology foundations are prepared to support possible physical AI implementations. Modernization should produce a "living" AI foundation: an organization-wide, real-time system that adjusts dynamically to business and regulatory change. Key concepts covered in the report: Leaders are making it possible for modular, cloud-native platforms that safely link, govern, and integrate all data types.
Steps to Implementing Machine Learning Operations for 2026Forward-thinking companies converge operational, experiential, and external information flows and invest in progressing platforms that expect requirements of emerging AI. AI modification management: How do I prepare my labor force for AI?
The most successful companies reimagine tasks to seamlessly integrate human strengths and AI capabilities, ensuring both aspects are used to their fullest capacity. New rolesAI operations managers, human-AI interaction specialists, quality stewards, and otherssignal a deeper shift: AI is now a structural part of how work is organized. Advanced companies simplify workflows that AI can execute end-to-end, while people concentrate on judgment, exception handling, and strategic oversight.
Latest Posts
Securing Complex Cloud Environments
Optimizing IT Infrastructure for Remote Centers
Methods for Scaling Global IT Infrastructure